Rumors of Our Demise Have Proven Less Than Accurate

  • Posted on October 2, 2026 at 1:39 pm

by JetBoy

Friends of Juicy Secrets!

You may have been wondering about the status of our beloved site since the lights went out a couple of weeks ago, so here I am with some answers — and glad tidings. Sorry about the delay; we didn’t have a lot of information ourselves. In fact, we still don’t know everything.

First, the bad news: it’s almost certainly the case that some malicious party got us shut down. We’ve not been able to get the specific details, but all the evidence points to it. At the same time, our site email address also got the kibosh.

Now, the better news: it wasn’t our host that cut off access, so unlike the previous two shutdowns, we still have somewhere for Juicy Secrets to be. Basically, the site is still there, but the road to it has been blocked. Which means that if we can’t get the barricade removed (and it’s looking more and more like we can’t), we just have to set up an alternative route. Which we have done.

We’d prefer it didn’t have to come to this, having built up a considerable audience for JS right where it is, but needs must. We don’t want to lose JS, and hope you feel the same way.

The new address for Juicy Secrets Mark 4 (or rather, Juicy Secrets Mark 3.5) is

https://juicysecrets.dreamhosters.com

Come ye, come ye…

Yrs, JetBoy

25
3
4
7
1
What did you think of this story?
[Votes: 55 Average: 5]

53 Comments on Rumors of Our Demise Have Proven Less Than Accurate

  1. Klimt5 says:

    Hello you lovely people. So glad to see you again. I was hoping it was temperory and good luck for the future. I understand if 3rd parties don’t understand the concept of fantasies and that of free speech not to say free thought. Oand of course an empathetic understanding of human psychlogy. Congrats and… Thank you!
    Love you guys and grateful for the refuge! xxx

  2. Ti. says:

    Really good to read this Jetboy,quite a relief after not being able to access JS!
    Well done for coming up with this replacement!!!

  3. E. M. Parsons says:

    Good to see it back.

  4. Keiko says:

    All I can say is YAY!!!!! And a Medal of Honor to Jetboy!

    1
    • Kim & Sue says:

      Agree with that all the way!

      • JetBoy says:

        I can only take a modestly sized portion of credit for the site’s return. If I were the only one on the problem, you’d be waiting until the final trumpet for the new Juicy Secrets.

        Amanda’s contribution to our escape from the crypt was considerable, so respect must be paid. As ever, my eternal gratitude for her stabilizing presence and ability to ask the right questions. Just knowing she intended to stay gave me the moxie to keep going.

        And a special shout-out to a new member of the JS team with serious computer chops (compared to yours truly, who can barely operate the camera on his cell phone). He slashed through our thicket of obstacles like it was tissue paper, in the process revealing that our solution was far simpler than we’d feared. Our friend wishes to maintain a low profile, for fully comprehensible reasons, so I will hereby refer to him as Erototech. He gave me permission to give him a silly name, and is probably already regretting that.

        Thanks must also be extended to all the denizens of the JS world who expressed concern by writing to ask what the bloody blazes was going on with Juicy Secrets. Thanks for caring… and welcome back!

        • Kim & Sue says:

          Medals and hugs all around we say, for all the great JS folks who got it back up, um, so to speak.

  5. G. Hulse says:

    Thank you for the update and keeping JS alive.

  6. Purple Les says:

    Just Great that JS is back. But what a conundrum. If I hadn’t got an e-mail with the new address I wouldn’t be here. If you’re like me and just bring up the site in your browser to go here, there is no connection. So I see what JB means about losing a lot of readers who would just ‘browse’ in. Well, one thing at a time. Just wonderful to be able to be here again, hopefully with out another attack on the site.

  7. Joe Dornish says:

    Great to see the site back up and running again!

    Thank you to the everyone who worked so hard to get it back up and running.

  8. Foreversweet says:

    So relieved and delighted that we are back up and running again – I so love the stories here, so much beautiful erotic fantasy which could have been lost. Well done and thanks!!

  9. Treachery says:

    It would have been a goddamn shame if Juicy Secrets and all of its content had gone *POOF*!

    But somehow i knew that it will return. Just a matter of time. Fortunately, the wait was shorts.

    Kudos to everyone that helped resurrect Juicy Secrets!

    You have our gratitude.

  10. Nina says:

    This is wonderful news that it’s back – thank you with heartfelt appreciation!!!

  11. Sapphmore says:

    Once more unto the breach, dear friends …

    And so yet again the ‘Warriors of the secrets of juicy’ have gone into battle to save all that we hold dear. Sir Jetboy, the Lady Amanda and the newest knight, Sir Erototech (like others before) have fought the tyrannical dragon that seeks to take away our thoughts and words.
    I’m not a believer in deities, but something must be looking down and protecting us from oblivion and so we give heartfelt thanks to our intrepid warriors for saving this fabulous archive.

    Superb work!

    1
    1
    1
  12. craw2519 says:

    Hello to all the denizens at Juicy Secrets, especially mentioning Miss Amanda and our new Erototech who saved the day. Sapphmore put it so elequently and I have no words to add except that I am so happy and relieved to see JS back up and functioning. Trying other erotic sites, I have come to appreciate JS so much as you are the absolute best erotic site out there. Keep up the good work and so glad to have you back.

  13. kinkys_sis says:

    So pleased for you all that you guys got it sorted; well done.

    I have no proof, but I’d suggest being more careful with the pics used on stories. They can cause more trouble than the actual written word.

    • Purple Les says:

      You may be right, I see a lot of the story pictures have been scrubbed.

      • JetBoy says:

        You are correct. We are in the process of scrubbing photos of little girls, even ones with zero erotic content. Turns out some folks don’t like their images accompanying sex stories involving underage girls. Go figure.

        Mind you, we have No Goddamn Idea what got us kneecapped (we’re still waiting for the word from on high), but those images seem like a safe bet. Breaks my heart to see some of them go, but such is life in a world policed by two-bit Anthony Comstocks.

        1
        • craw2519 says:

          I agree that it is sad to see the photos being scrubbed as they made up such lovely part of any story and helped with visualizing the story involved.
          It is sad how society has gone from the free love life style of the 60’s and 70’s to the Comstockery of this day in age. Not naming the country (Roe/Wade), but there is one that is so full of Comstocks, I am surprised that they haven’t brought back the public square wooden stock.

          • Purple Les says:

            Well, learned something new. Had to look up Anthony Cumsock. He looks like he could have used a good blowjob back in the day.

            I guess they couldn’t bring back the public square wooden stock, because all those hypocrites would be in it. IMHO.

            3
        • 30smom says:

          In modern times feminism is more instrumental in shutting down smut than the right wing. An argument can be made for both but it’s ironic that feminists are so at odds with themselves with one half being pro smut and the other policing everybody they don’t see as politically correct.

          Eve Ensler is a great example of feminists eating their own. After she published a sex-positive fictional short story about a 13 year old girl being sexually awakened by a 24 year old lesbian, many versions of her work were either censored or the age of the teenage girl was changed due to mostly feminist backlash.

          An even better example is the Kanalratten, an autonomous group of lesbians in 1980s Berlin who wrote a manifesto about love between women and little girls as a resistance to institutional violence and power-imbalance instead of a cause of those things. The manifesto is still online somewhere. Feminists resisted.

          Thank you Jetboy for getting the site back up again.

          1
          • JetBoy says:

            Eh, I don’t know… it seems like the anti-porn wing of the feminist movement all but vanished following their heyday in the late 80’s and early 90’s. That was also when pro-porn feminists like Susie Bright, Pat Califa and Kathy Acker began to make themselves known.

            Actually, I think what turned the tide is the increasing amount of porn created by women. There’s a lot of it out there, and most of it is damn good.

            1
            • 30smom says:

              The modern right wing is worse when it comes to censorship of things like children’s drag shows and sex education materials. And to a lesser extent wanting more severe punishments. But they’re still not the ones at the front of the anti-smut movement or raising the age of consent for sex and marriage. That is still feminists. Sometimes it’s a conservative brand of feminism, but still feminism.

              Feminists are also at the front of calling girls dressed in girls’ clothes abuse. If it’s too revealing it’s sexualizing them, and if it’s too childish it’s infantilizing them. It’s no wonder so many girls don’t look like girls anymore.

              You also never hear any feminist views as liberal as the names you mentioned anymore. Pat Califia originally outlined the need for older lesbians in sexually bringing out young girls, but then later apologized and changed her views.

              Feminism has changed a lot now embracing political correctness and almost everything else other than the most important issues. And is more poisoned than ever with radical feminist undertones.

              Then again I’m more familiar with feminism than with the religious right which I’m not defending.

              2
              • JetBoy says:

                Nope, not seeing it. I live in Bay Area California, a hot bed of feminist beliefs and rhetoric, and I’ve seen nothing like what you describe in action. The last anti-porn feminist I encountered was in mid-80’s Santa Cruz (where the air fairly crackled with woman energy), whereas everyone I see or read who crusades against adult entertainment these days is firmly ensconced on the Republican right.

                And THIS…

                “Feminists are also at the front of calling girls dressed in girls’ clothes abuse. If it’s too revealing it’s sexualizing them, and if it’s too childish it’s infantilizing them.”

                …is simply ridiculous. Feminists are maintaining that a girl dressed in girl’s clothing is abuse? This sounds like no feminist rhetoric I have EVER encountered. And abuse by whom? Some phantom male chauvinist pig who doesn’t allow his daughter/girlfriend/wife to pick her own outfits? (Again, whenever I encounter a journalistic screed complaining about women dressing too provocatively, it’s always from some right-wing moralist who inevitably blames such behavior on – wait for it – feminism.)

                And your line, “It’s no wonder so many girls don’t look like girls anymore,” kinda got my dander up. Pray tell, what does a “girl” look like? Or maybe I should ask, in your opinion, what is a girl supposed to look like? Once again, this sounds far more like a conservative scold than any feminist.

                I could dismantle this comment for a few more paragraphs, but life is short. Sure, feminists can go too far, like anyone on the political spectrum, but you’re really advancing some strawman arguments here.

                1
          • Kim & Sue says:

            Now known as V, formerly Eve Ensler. Author of the Vagina Monologues. One of us at one time thought it was like a ventriloquist show except they talked through their pussy instead of a doll. Was disappointing that their was no bare pussy, just talking.

    • Joe Dornish says:

      I agree about the pics. I go the whole hog and just take all pics down. I mean, they’re nice, but we’re here for the words, not the images.

      • Rabbyrob says:

        One of the stellar aspects of this site is how evocative much of the excellent prose is which carries that additional bonus where each of us conjure up our own images from the text. In many ways a single image detracts from incredible writing where deft editing draws far more nuance.

        On a related note the lack of editing on other sites I had to resort to when this haven was particularly apparent too..

  14. Emiliano says:

    Thanks a lot. Any chance we can contact you if it happens again?

    1
    • JR Kain says:

      I was going to suggest something like this myself. I was out there on a ledge for several weeks thinking the site was gone forever and had no way of connecting with anyone else for information.

      • craw2519 says:

        I am in agreement. While JS was not searchable, I was so afraid it was gone forever. I only saw JS was back up was from an email I got letting me know of this new post, which Jetboy had posted, letting us know JS was still around at a new location. Thanks Jetboy.

  15. Lakeisha says:

    Glad to see you back JS!🥰

  16. jafo40 says:

    Ty to Jetboy and crew for fighting the good fight. I was searching high and low for JS, missing stories old and new to read.

  17. dw says:

    You might want to let some major sites with links to JS know about the URL change. Nifty comes to mind and I’m sure there are other examples out there. Glad you’re back!

  18. Felicia says:

    All I can say is that I’m glad you’re back missed you

  19. MusicMan says:

    I cannot even explain how glad I am to find juicysecrets still in existence. I was beginning to be sure it was gone. I only happened to find the update by a chance search. I’d been checking for the site by url pretty much every day. Thank you thank you thank you to all who restored it and run it.

    • No One says:

      Out of curiosity, where did you find it?

      • sue says:

        Just out of curiosity, I put juicysecrets in my browser and a juicysecrets.dreamhosters.com came up with this blog. Other than that looking for juicy secrets club is still futile.

        • No One says:

          Ah yes, I see that it shows up on Duckduckgo and Bing now. I guess that explains the influx of visitors. Still nothing on Google for me.

      • MusicMan says:

        I put juicysecrets as one word with no domain into startpage. And I got the blog post about rumors of our demise… .

        1
      • Jay W says:

        To add my 2 cents, I found the new url on a different site, same one I found your stories on.

  20. Erocritique says:

    It would have been a damn shame if this site had ended – again. I feel this site is just hitting its stride. If the pictures are the hitch, then ditch them. The stories are more than adequate. Meanwhile: Many more years, and thanks to all who resurrected our kinky little oasis once again. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    1
    1
  21. Jasmine y. says:

    So glad to see y’all back, I knew you were working on a new domain but I couldn’t find it until now so I was starting to get worried. Looking forward to both new and old stories 🙂

  22. Rosey says:

    Glad to see the site is alive and well! I was worried it was gone for good, but fortunately Amanda posted the new link on Reddit.

  23. Rabbyrob says:

    So glad I have found your most recent phoenix like incarnation & really should find a way to stay in more regular contact instead of the habitual lurker…(Yes I know that means commenting more on the incredible oeuvre you have archived here…

  24. JailedRader says:

    My fucking god i am legally blind i did not read the front page i am a doofus
    Welp, happy that y’all are back.

Leave a Reply

Please review the terms of use and comment etiquette before commenting. Messages that break our rules will be removed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.